<h4>Chapter 238: Irond Warship</h4>
At the time of the outbreak of the Near East War, other regions of the world were also in turmoil. The conflict between Great Britain, France, and Russia presented an opportunity for the United States across the ocean.
First, Cuba created a stir, but their efforts were thwarted by the Spanish, resulting in a major setback. They also faced warnings from Britain and France, forcing them to retreat andy low.
The Americans did not give up, however. In July 1853, the United States caused the ck Ships incident in Japan, using military threats to force the shogunate to ept their terms, resulting in the signing of the Treaty of Kanagawa.
Given the opportunistic nature of the great powers, they did not want to see the United States monopolize the benefits in Japan. As a result, nations such as Great Britain, France, and the Nethends quickly followed suit and pressured the shogunate to sign simr treaties.
The news reached Vienna and presented an opportunity for the Austrian colonial faction, which was considering entering the fray. The Austrian government deliberated whether to take advantage of the situation.
Prime Minister Felix spoke up, “Your Majesty, Japan is too far away, and the benefits we can gain there are limited. It’s not worth expending too much effort.
Our focus now should still be on domestic development, especially the consolidation of Southern Germany. Rather than taking action in East Asia, infiltration into the German Federal Empire would be more in line with our interests.”
Navy Minister Filkos disagreed, saying, “Prime Minister, taking action in East Asia doesn’t cost us much. Even the Dutch can pressure the Japanese government intopliance, so it wouldn’t be difficult for us to obtain simr benefits.
Currently, the Japanese government is like a frightened bird, hardly daring to say no to what we want to propose.
Even if diplomatic efforts fail, we have treaties with the Nethends, Spain, and Portugal that allow us to receive supplies from their colonies. It wouldn’t be difficult to send a fleet to Asia to intimidate Japan.”
Austria had made efforts to establish overseas colonies. One such measure was the signing of treaties with declining colonial empires, under the condition that Austria would not covet the colonies of these nations.
In the short term, this was like a nk check, since Austria had no overseas colonies. However, no one doubted Austria’s ability to establish overseas colonies.
As per tradition, a rising empire would inevitably encroach on the spheres of influence of established empires. Since the Austrian government expressed a willingness to coexist peacefully, no one objected.
Metternich analyzed, “There are many countries that covet Japan, and now that they have opened their doors, it’s likely that everyone will rush in.
In fact, the Russians had ns to colonize Japan a long time ago. If it weren’t for the outbreak of the Near East War, the Americans might not have had the chance to get there first.
Under the current international situation, it wouldn’t be a big problem for us to join in and take a share, but to obtain greater benefits, we must dispatch a naval fleet.”
Austria’s navy wasn’t very impressive, even after some expansion under Franz’s reign.
However, strength is rtive. Compared to the naval powerhouses of Britain and France, Austria’s navy was hardly worth mentioning. But bullying Japan at this time wouldn’t pose any pressure.
Yet, this doesn’t justify Austria dispatching a naval fleet to the Far East. The key consideration is still the matter of benefits.
After a moment of hesitation, Franz made a decision: “The Far East is not our focus for expansion. Even if we pursue overseas colonization, we must avoid conflicts with European countries as much as possible.
For now, let’s focus on unimed territories. Even if they are deste, it doesn’t matter; we can start by umting experience.
What we should do now is send out more exploration teams to surveynds not yet upied by other countries. Any area that is easy to govern, we can take over to practice. There’s no need to excessively chase immediate benefits.
As for Japan, we will simply follow the steps of other countries and secure our share of the benefits without further expansion.”
Franz spoke these words with apparent ease, but deep down it was with a heavy heart. It was a struggle to catch thest train of the colonial empires, but due to the limitations of the navy, Austria could only pick up the leftovers from Britain and France.
Even older colonial empires such as Spain and the Nethends, not to mention Britain and France, could cause Austria considerable trouble if it recklessly attempted to seize richer territories.
Overseas colonization was not only about power; it was also about methods of governance. As a neer who hastily joined these old empires, these empires do not even need to use force. Just setting a trap for them could cause significant losses.
In the historical case of the Americans seizing the Philippine Inds, it appeared to be a victory, but the difficulties were known only to themselves. Thend that was rich under Spanish rule became a loss-making asset in their hands.
This was the case even in the resource-rich Philippine Inds. If this were a more remote and poorer region, the losses would probably be even greater.
Colonization was costly. Without experience in managing colonies, blindly joining the colonial forces was a sure path to financial loss!
Inparison, Franz was more inclined to nt a g on uninhabited inds, where just a few soldiers could be stationed to dere sovereignty without worrying aboutpetition.
Of course, such inds are either geologically inhospitable or too small to be of much use. At best, they could serve as resource reserves.
Navy Minister Filkos suggested: “Your Majesty, we have always been developing on the European continent and haven’t made our presence felt globally, which is very detrimental to our future colonial expansion.
How about organizing a global sea voyage, visiting countries around the world, while looking for opportunities to im some unimednds as our first step out of Europe?”
Almost every rise of a naval power had been apanied by a major naval battle. Obviously, Austriacked such an opportunity and could not find such a stepping stone.
Britain and France are simply unbeatable and would remain so even after twenty years of development. Franz has no intention of courting death by challenging the maritime superpowers.
If Austria had topromise, it was a pity that there were no other countries worth opposing. Looking at the map, the rest are out of range and have insufficient conflict of interest.
Unless one considers attacking the Ottoman Empire, whose navy once ranked fifth in the world, barely qualifying as a worthy opponent.
However, given the current situation, Franz seriously doubted that the Ottoman government had the financial capacity to build such a fleet.
Without a suitable opponent, the only path left was a different one. After all, Austria was an established empire and didn’t need to fight a war to assert its status as a great power. Already on the stage, why bother fighting for a ticket to enter?
As a civilized man, Franz detests war. In his view, war means risk, and those who recklessly start wars without sufficient benefits are doomed to fail in this era.
The current proposal of the Minister of the Navy is actually based on the international political environment. As Austria pursues a conservative colonial strategy, military deterrence bes crucial.
Even if it can’t intimidate Britain and France, it should at least show strength to deter other countries to avoid unnecessary trouble in overseas colonization.
Historically, the United States established its status as a naval power in the early 20th century through an impressive global naval voyage.
This is feasible, but it assumes that the Austrian navy has the necessary strength, which Franz seriously doubts. Crossing the ocean is not so easy in this day and age, and circumnavigating the globe still poses significant challenges.
In the event of an ident along the way, what began as a show of strength could turn into a major embarrassment, and that would be quite a spectacle. The Austrian Navy has no experience in global navigation, and whether their warships can withstand such a voyage is a question in itself.
If a warship broke down en route, where would repairs be made? How would they manage logistical support during long ocean voyages? How would sailors cope with prolonged life at sea? All of these issues must be considered.
Franz asked directly, “Filkos, are you sure our navy can do this without bing an international joke?”
Of course, given the gravity of the situation, Filkos couldn’t guarantee sess. Not even the British or French navies would dare to guarantee a trouble-free voyage around the world.
Filkos encouraged, “Your Majesty, this is a medium-term strategic concept, and it’s certainly not feasible at the beginning. We could start by choosing a long ocean route to gain experience, and then attempt to circumnavigate the world when the time is right.
In addition, our navy has been preparing. To close the gap with the naval powers of Britain and France, we have developed our own irond ship technology, which is now mature.
We have already ced orders, and the first irond is expected to join the Navy within two years.
This epoch-making warship will rewrite naval history, rendering all current naval vessels of other nations obsolete.”
As a new challenger looking to gain an edge in naval power, the best strategy was to drive technological innovation, phase out old warships, and bring everyone back to the same starting line.
Historically, the explosive growth of the German navy was due to the advent of the dreadnought era, which allowed them to catch up with the British.
The Austrian navy was no exception. If they tried to catch up with the British and French by developing sailing warships, nobody had the confidence to bridge such arge gap.
When Franz introduced the concept of irond ships three years ago, it caught the attention of the Austrian Navy. After careful study by shipyard engineers, it was determined that irond ships were theoretically feasible.
Since they were feasible, it was only natural to proceed with development. In recent years, Austria’s increased naval budget had beenrgely invested in warship research and development, and now it was finally bearing fruit.
Regardless of how many sailing warships the British and French had, once irond ships were introduced, those vessels would be obsolete.
Blocking technology was impossible; at the time, the world’s navies were only a conceptual breakthrough away from irond ships, and there were no significant technical barriers.
During this period, the French Navy also began to develop irond ships. After receiving information about the French irond ships, the British had a simr n by 1856.
Of course, it will take time to move from research and development to actual service. The introduction of new technology can’t be smooth sailing. Even if research and development had started a few years earlier, Franz wasn’t sure who would be the first to build an irond warship.
What he demanded was the construction of irond warships, not just ships with ayer of iron on the exterior of the vessel. If it was just adding ayer of iron, that concept had already been around for hundreds of years and wouldn’t require any development.
Prince Windisch-Gr?tz questioned, “Ironds? Mr. Filkos, are you sure a fully iron warship, after being armed with cannons, won’t sink and will still be able to move?”
This was the opinion of many, with the first impression being that it would sink. Ironds would certainly be much heavier than wooden warships. Adding cannons, ammunition, and personnel, whether they could move was a wonder.
Filkos, dissatisfied, said: “Your Highness, please do not question my professionalism. If it’s the same tonnage, an irond can’t carry as much as a wooden warship because of its weight.
However, wooden warships are limited by raw materials. With current technology, nations can only build warships with a discement of about 4,000 tons, but ironds don’t have this limitation.
We just need to increase the tonnage of the warship topensate for this small issue.
The armor of an irond can withstand enemy cannon fire. Even a 48-pound cannon will only cause minor problems.
And because the body of an irond is more stable, we can equip it with explosive shell guns. Against sailing warships, as long as it hits a critical spot, one shot can take out the enemy.
Ironds use steam power, so you don’t have to worry about speed; you can look to steamships for reference.
On the battlefield, one irond can easily take down a dozen sailing warships.”
These are the advantages of ironds, but of course, their disadvantage is the skyrocketing cost, something Filkos certainly wouldn’t mention.
Anyway, as long as Austria wanted to engage in colonial expansion and the Cab saw the power of ironds, they were unlikely to give them up.
Prince Windisch-Gr?tz continued, “My apologies, Filkos. I’m not questioning your expertise. I’m just puzzled. If ironds have so many advantages, why aren’t other countries building them? Have we be the world''s number one in shipbuilding?”
Filkos said confidently, “Your Highness, that statement is not entirely urate. We are not the only ones interested in ironds.
As far as I know, the French also have simr designs, but they haven’t started implementing them yet.
Both Britain and France have arge number of sailing warships. When the era of ironds arrives, all these warships will have to be dmissioned.
This is not only an economic loss, but more importantly, they would lose much of their naval advantage. Everyone would have to start from the same starting line.
Therefore, even if they have ns in this direction, they must weigh the pros and cons. Rushing to innovate in shipbuilding technology will not only bring benefits but could also lead to disaster.
As ater, we don’t have that kind of pressure. Due to theck of overseas colonies, our navy can’tpare with theirs.
Even if we start from scratch, we are at an advantage. In fact, right now, just two ironds could match the total tonnage of the Austrian Navy.”
Finance Minister Karl eximed in shock, “What, the discement of an irond exceeds ten thousand tons? How much money would that cost?”
This was not surprising; naval warships were not veryrge in this era, and the total tonnage of the Austrian Navy was only this much.
The Finance Minister’s surprise wasn’t about the size of the ship, but a professional reaction to how much it would cost to build such a warship.
Filkos said calmly, “Not that much. I exaggerated a bit. The discement of an irond is about eight or nine thousand tons.
The exact data will be known once it’s built. As you all know, the effect of new technology is full of uncertainties. A small discrepancy in the final discement is eptable.
The cost is a bit higher than ordinary warships, but the outstanding performance of an irond is worth the price. Including weapons and equipment, it costs about three to four million guilders, and it won’t exceed five million.
This is the first irond, and a lot of the technology has to be experimented with. As we build more, the cost wille down.”
A single warship, including its weapons and equipment, would consume a third of the Navy’s annual budget. Franz knew that the era of the Navy burning through money had arrived.
With the amount of money it takes to build one irond, you could build five or six first-ss sailing ships. This will inevitably put even more financial pressure on the colonial empires.
Everyone fell into deep thought, beginning to weigh the pros and cons, contemting whether to spark a new round of naval arms race.
Support Dragon Legion on Ko-fi