《Sons and Enemies》 Prologue - Publishers Note Publisher''s note The events that immediately prefaced what the modern scientific community describes as a "spontaneous mass obliteration event," or what has colloquially been referred to as The Cull (case ref: SJ09-3R-62) are already documented. Many texts provide thorough documentation and analysis of the sequence of events that led to the disappearance of roughly 140,000,000 people across the globe. We recommend Helen Ensphere''s excellent Whatever Is Left for a thorough, measured compilation of global accounts to better understand the documented events leading to and culminating on March 3, 1998. This particular publication does not intend to add to the volumes of journalism concerning already well-established facts. There is little need to. Rather, it offers a unique and exclusive view into the person(s) directly involved in The Cull, in their own words, via a series of personal correspondence. We cannot yet divulge how these crucial pieces of evidence of one of mankind''s most heinous atrocities came into our possession, but their authenticity has been verified by numerous expert panels, government agencies, and by the identifiable correspondents themselves. As has already been made public, we continue to secure additional correspondence. As the various letters arrive, they continue to be analyzed by global experts for authenticity and for any indication of the whereabouts of those responsible for 3/3. This story originates from a different website. Ensure the author gets the support they deserve by reading it there. According to the most recent carbon record analysis, all correspondence ended several years after The Cull took place. What we do not yet know, and what this collection hopes to help achieve, is a more complete understanding of the conditions that led to our shared calamity. It is our hope that by publishing these documents, we will contribute to a growing body of knowledge whose only sensible design is to prevent such events from recurring. December 1979 My dear Michael, You never met your grandfather. He passed well before I came to the U.S. and met your mother. There was a time that I would have said you were the better for it. But time has a way of refining things. What we think of the people in our lives can change. It really isn''t unlike wine. You bottle away a vintage, stow it in a cellar, and forget about it. And it isn''t until you come across the thing, perhaps unintentionally, many years later that you wipe the dust from its label, recall the harvest that produced the vintage, and let memories come back to you. Perhaps you''d kept those memories at bay, actively repressing and keen to avoid entire topics of thought. Perhaps you''d simply forgotten them. I imagine you would do the latter. What you might not know when you discover that bottle is that time itself has transformed what was once a barely passable Sangiovese into something potentially extraordinary. All the elements for greatness were always there: the earth, the rain, the ash, the process. But you could always produce nothing better than a mediocrity. Unauthorized duplication: this tale has been taken without consent. Report sightings. The missing element, then, was only time. Time, that insatiable construct. That thresher of what was. That furnace for what is to come. Time is what transforms every low thing into a higher form. The irony, I find, is that in order to know the effects of time, you have to ruin its work. You have to open the bottle. I''ve opened the bottle when it comes to my father. And I want you to do the same with me. I used to think my father an exceptionally cruel man. And while time has softened some of my recollections, it is inarguable that he had a coldness about him in countenance and deed. I want you to understand him as I do now. I want you to consider such things as cruelty as matters of perception. Don''t mistake me: I am not asking for absolution for the things I''ve done or failed to do. By now, you and the civilized world know who I am and some of what I''ve done. You also know some of what I have not done; namely, be a father to you in the traditional sense. Please take this letter as an effort to begin building, despite all the destruction I''ve caused. I''d have you and your own son open a finer vintage than the one I hid away even before you were born. Yours January 1980 My dear Michael, I don''t envy you. Remember that. Not for how you''ll see your own son grow, nor for how present you''re able to be in his life. Just remember: he is your responsibility on good days and bad. When he is obedient and when he is obstinate. When seemingly random things around your home go missing. When you think you see him levitating just above the floor. When light begins to pour from his hands. They say it skips generations, passed along the paternal line. You''re spared, of course. You know that by now. Your son, however, is likely a different matter. If you encounter this tale on Amazon, note that it''s taken without the author''s consent. Report it. Just remember: whatever he becomes, he is yours. Whatever I''ve become, you are mine. Yours The Hunt, The Storm, The Start My Dear Michael, I want to tell you about my first pet: a fox I''d happened across while on a hunt with your grandfather. "Pet" may not be the best term for it because I didn''t own it, per se. I wasn''t responsible for the creature''s care, though there were times that it would pain me to think of its distress. So I would check in on it, sometimes even provide for it from a distance. I recall you having similar feelings for the various whelps and felines you brought into your homes over the years. It seems to me that throughout our lives we all adopt many things - children, creatures, habits, contemporaries, ideas - simply by giving them preference in our hearts and minds. Our charges may not always be aware of their status, but that doesn''t change whether we feel for them, does it? So ownership isn''t a requisite for feeling responsible - rather, it only takes developing a preference for an outcome. Sometimes, that happens through willful, conscious decision. Sometimes, it simply happens. The fox was something that simply happened. I think that is why I recall it so vividly. So few things do. The Hunt Nothing has been kept from you as far as your family background. The press has driven the facts of your lineage to a summit you couldn''t ignore even if you wanted to. And I know you''ve wanted to so badly. I am aware of how surprised you were to learn that your family name was a minor aristocratic figure for a brief time. Like many examples of wealthy families, our wealth was not due to success in business, but in deft navigation of credit. Our brief glory, if it can be called as such, was founded upon borrowed capital - and your grandfather was somewhat skilled at the political maneuvering necessary to sustain appearances, the household, and his tenuous enterprises while the longer-term investment - otherwise known as his only child - matured and could place his own name and lines of credit toward additional ventures. With careful planning, this would eventually pay dividends as more progeny, properly reared, would yield more potential profit. You might think of this as a grift that spans generations - and you would not be wrong. Things may have worked that way, as they have for many families throughout history, had your grandmother not died during childbirth. Your grandfather never remarried. His grief gradually smoothed into fatalism, as happens. I was young and didn''t understand at the time, but it is clear now that the loss was great enough to create a presence in his life, something that eclipsed any additive his dealings, his property, or his son could offer. Loss isn''t always a negative; in fact, it never is. You can, after all, feel an absence, can''t you? Sometimes, an absence is more potent than presence ever could be. The shade of what remains outshines the memory of light. Your grandfather did not cease all of his business functions immediately. He spent well more than a decade as an echo of himself, still conducting his enterprise though with less and less conviction or sense of purpose. Though he was an occasional sportsman, he never seemed to enjoy it. To be fair, he never seemed to derive joy from much. Even leisure, seen in its greater context, can become additional work, another responsibility to shoulder, a role to play with as much spontaneity and pleasure as paying one''s taxes. This was the man that took me on the pheasant hunt: a man that was forever paying a perceived due in life, one that remained in collection while he drew breath. Our land was wooded, of course, and not unattractive. Great trees whose names I''d had no interest in learning and dense thickets punctuated by gasps of emerald undergrowth. Your grandfather rarely engaged me and the countryside never entertained me, so I was ill-suited for both. I was scarcely big or strong enough to handle the rifle. By this point, your grandfather had released many of the retainers and servants on the property. He had little genuine interest in the sport, so he had no desire for a driven hunt. This venture was solely our own, without benefit of beaters or retrievers. I was never troubled by solitude; in fact, I was more accustomed to it than company. And your grandfather''s presence, as rarely as I experienced it, may as well have been a familiar absence. We drove up guineas, though only two or three at a time, at several points. I followed your grandfather''s instruction as well as I could manage, but could never bring the barrel up fast enough. Truth be told, I didn''t want to shoot pheasant. My sensitivities were such that causing harm for sport, let alone as an empty gesture to our socially imposed heritage, seemed grotesque. I recall your grandfather''s disgust when, after the second set of guineas burst from the bushes, I hesitated. "Haven''t got the stomach?" he asked. I shook my head. I could scarcely meet his eyes on a normal day, but could feel in that hard stare all the resentment he''d cultivated for me since I came into this world and ended his own. He raised his rifle, pivoted with the fluttering guinea, and downed them both. "Ironic," he said and turned to gather them. We later descended into a brushed depression. The weather had cooled early that year and enough foliage had dropped that we could see well enough through the skeletal fingers of the copse a portion of an ancient stone wall in a distant clearing. I felt that I''d humiliated your grandfather with such a poor showing. A peculiar feeling tugged at me: the tinge of early embarrassment. A very unpleasant warmth that wells inside a cavity children are seldom born with, but are always inevitably given in the course of their young lives. Your grandfather sat against the rise of the hillside, his back to the clearing. He laced his fingers and rested them on his chest. He watched the endless marble sky above. In the quick glances I would risk, I could see his resignation and my eyes burned with anguish and anger. No answers are guaranteed to prayers or petitions and I do not know if your grandfather made either to heaven. But I know he didn''t seem to hear any response. A movement in the distance drew my eye: the sudden red sash of a fox at the base of the wall. It wasn''t unusual to see them in our part of the country, but I was not an adventuring child. So it fascinated me as it unfurled, posed, and paced along the base of the wall. It was never clear to me why the creature seemed equally fascinated in me. It would watch me, pace several feet, then pivot and repeat. Your grandfather didn''t seem to notice my interest. He still only watched the endless mass of clouds slough over us. Stolen story; please report. I resolved to salvage my rare outing by bagging the fox. I will shoot it, I thought to myself. But I only brought the rifle to my hip. If I miss, I thought, I''m no worse a hunter. In truth, I''d hoped to miss. It was a beautiful creature that had revealed itself to me. I suppose in that moment, I''d thought of it as a pet - as something whose well-being concerned me. Imagine my surprise when, despite a halfhearted and unskilled hip shot, the fox buckled from the force of the bullet. It rolled backward and against the wall. Your grandfather bolted up and grabbed the gun from me. Then he matched my gaze and together we watched the poor creature raise itself and limp into the brush. He took a moment to recover from the sudden gunfire, then offered the rifle back to me. "A fox, eh?" he said. "Better than nothing. Go finish it, then." Of course, I couldn''t. I was devastated. I''d never killed anything, never even set out to harm anything, let alone something so beautiful. Whether an animal is wild or domestic, children often see them as their wards. We depend on the poor creatures even for our early grasp of language, associating an animal''s picture with its name and the sound it makes. Disrupting their innate behaviors is our early foray into violence, and that often without reason. We silence their voices. We exert our will onto the natural world and, by virtue of our dominance, we destroy an early illusion of harmony. Literally and figuratively, bloody pelts line the halls of our maturation. My humiliation grew and my eyes brimmed. Your grandfather cradled the rifle, sighed, and bid me keep pace with him as we returned to the house. "Let it suffer, then," he said. The end is all the same, even if getting there is less than pleasant.